U. S. Artillery. — Some of the patriotic
presses of the country have chuckled with great apparent delight that
the U. S. Artillery under Gen. Taylor should have found themselves at
Corpus Christi “without guns.” At the risk of disturbing their
equanimity, we copy the following explanatory article from the last
number of the Union:
Our artillery regiments are not armed as
field-artillery, and were never meant to be, in the whole, so armed.
They are armed, (the regiments, except one company in each,) and
always have been, as infantry serving in the fortifications with heavy
guns. They are called artillery in the law, and are meant for
garrisons to the sea-coast fortifications. We have four regiments of
this artillery, or forty companies. If these were all field-artillery,
they would require 240 field-pieces, guns and howitzers –
field-artillery sufficient for an army of 240,000 men, according to the
rule which prevails in modern armies. This, though a preposterous force
of artillery, if armed as field-artillery, for any army the
United States can ever maintain or send into the field, is much too
small for complete garrisons of our forts on the sea-coast and lake
frontiers. These forts, when completed, are estimated to mount 6800
heavy guns. The four regiments of artillery contain, rank and file, as
we see from the Army Register, 2168 men – less than one man to three
heavy cannon. In time of war this force would be increased; but it is
not meant ever to garrison the forts entirely with regulars. The
militia would, in great part, be employed for that purpose; and it is
certainly the best and most useful employment for that force. We shall,
however, have in each garrison a disciplined, well-instructed body of
artillerists, for the more difficult duties at the guns. This statement
shows the purpose of that part of our army called artillery. Of this,
four companies are, by law, equipped as field-artillery, with
guns and horses. Four such companies have been ordered to Texas. The
other twelve artillery companies sent thither are armed and instructed
as infantry; and, of course, are without “guns” – that is, “field
cannon.” The newspapers which have commented upon this mater may now
understand it.
Source: The Daily Picayune,
September 13, 1845, p. 2, col. 3.